Why not Past Godhra?

Every body cries only about Post Godhra riots that took place in 2002 Gujarat. But no body even talks about the root cause which was the burning of Sabarmati express train in Godhra burning alive 59 innocent humans just because they were hindus.

How post-Godhra riots would have happened, if there was no Godhra in the first place? Why nobody is trying to address this issue of Godhra?

Great secular stalwarts like Teesta Setalvad who says that she fights for a human cause, talks only about Post Godhra, why not about Past Godhra, i.e before Post Godhra? Werent they humans, those 59 innocent karsevaks who were returning from Ayodhya who were burnt alive in the train by muslims fundamentalists?

The same Teesta Setalvad who talks about the 5000 odd muslims who have been refugees since 2002 in Gujarat’s camps. Why doesnt she or anybody else ever utter a word about 4.5 lakh Kashmiri Hindus who have been refugees since 1990 in their own country!

Can Teesta Setalvad explain the difference between refugees of Gujarat and refugees of Kashmir? There has been an ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Kashmir by the islamic terrorists. Why nobody talks about this. Ethnic cleansing of serbs becomes an international issue, but not of Kashmiri Pandits. Why?

The answer has come in the form of the election results in Gujarat. Enough of this pseudo secularsim now.