Congressmen – Na Italy Ka, Na India Ka

Look at some of the news reports/reactions from Congress introspection meeting after it was routed out in the Gujarat elections.

Heads are unlikely to roll in Congress suggesting that there should not be any blame game as all are equally responsible.

How all are equally responsible? When party wins its because of Sonia and Rahul! When it loses all are equally responsible?

I demand that Sonia and Rahul resign from whatever positions they are holding in the Congress party owing moral responsibility for the defeat. They were the star campaigners in Gujarat who were parachuted from Delhi 14 times and did road shows and circus on the streets of our Gujarat.

Congress Committee General Secretary B K Hariprasad has said that “You should take the resignations if anyone has faulted somewhere”. Mr Hariprasad, cant you see Sonia faulted by calling Modi “Maut Ka Saudagar”? Take her resignation now.

Another Congress leader A K Antony has said, “It is not easy to win Gujarat”. Mr Antony, going forward its not easy to win anywhere in India as long as you have Sonia and Rahul in the party.

Now comes the masterpiece of news items in this list, which says,

Another senior leader expressed regret to Gandhi, who had addressed as many as 14 meetings during the last several months in the state, for letting her down in the crucially important state.

Who let down whom? What the heck? Does he think he is Gujarat? Gujaratis kicked out Congress. Why does he think that just because Sonia addressed 14 meetings we should vote for Congress? Modi attended over 100 meetings, and we would have still voted for him even if he had attended none, and we would not have voted for Congress even if Sonia had attended 1000 meetings. Got it?

Now my message to this senior leader who expressed regret to Sonia for having let her down is, resign from the party taking moral responsibility to the defeat and retire from politics.

Now again, the greatest masterpiece news item.

Another central leader said that “Any Central leader going to Gujarat was told the does and donts by the local partymen which included not to attack Modi and not to raise the issue of Sachar Committee report on Muslims.”

“Not to attack Modi”.. he he he.. Congressmen are so scared of him…
“Not to raise sachar committee report”.. and abhishek manusinghvi kept screaming to the top of his voice on the english media channels saying there is nothing called “Soft Hindutiva” by Congress in Gujarat.

Advertisements

Haneef – The Hero

Haneef! Who?

The same Dr. Haneef on whose arrest our great minority prime minister lost his sleep. When terror stuck in Mumbai, Varanasi, Hyderabad, Bangalore etc, our prime minister was happily sleeping under his rugs. Today when Hindus are being prosecuted in Malaysia he is again happily sleeping. But when poor Haneef got arrested in Australia on terror charges, he couldnt sleep but only weep.  

Anyway, coming back to Haneef, good that atleast one Indian accused of terrorism was later proven to be innocent. Haneef was let off saying he had nothing to do with the failed UK car bombing attacks. It was his cousins Kafeel Ahmed and Sabeel Ahmed who were behind those attacks, not Haneef.

Now Haneef wants Australian government to provide compensation for all the mental trauma he and his family went through. Perfectly valid. Since the australian police had arrested him without any proper evidence, and since he is proven not guilty, he and his family would have definitely gone through mental trauma when others thought him to be a terrorist and when he was behind the bars. Austrialian government should definitely provide him some compensation. I really mean it.

But now comes the interesting part which none have observed till todate. Why the hell has this joker Haneef not condemned his cousin brothers even once till today for the act of terror they did? Why hasnt he given even a single message to the muslim youth of India asking them not to follow the path of his cousin brothers? It has been over six months now and I have been observing all only celebrating that Haneef was released, but none condemning the acts of Kafeel and Sabeel.

Let us revisit the story of Haneef again. Dr Haneef tried to leave Australia on a one way ticket to India, without notifying his employer that he was taking leave.  He did not even have time to send a email to his employer!  The excuse was that he had a new born baby – wasn’t this baby already one month old when the incident took place?  Was it a surprise to Dr Haneef that this baby was born? Has he answered to these questions?

Coincidentally Dr Haneef’s attempted abrupt departure just happened to be when his cousins, with whom he had shared a house in London, tried to bomb an airport!

Even if Haneef was not involved in the attacks, wasnt his duty ATLEAST to tell the poice, media and country what the truth was, what his cousins were up to, anything else that he knew, and then say that he condemned it all, and to suggest the youth of his community not to follow the example of his cousins and cause both danger and shame to their country and religion?

He has not done any of these things and instead wants a compensation now.
Who will compensate for the acts of terror by his cousins? Who will compensate for the trauma undergone by the relatives of the victims of terrrorism which his cousins caused?

Why am I a Hindu?

There is a fundamental difference between saying “I am a Hindu” and between saying “I am a Christian or a Muslim”

When a person says “I am a Muslim” or “I am a Christian”, there is no place for any other religion. Islam does not believe in other religion and calls non-believers using a derogatory term called kafirs. Christianity says that if you are not a christian then you will go to hell. Forget about going to hell, if you are not a Hindu, then you are already IN HELL.

When a person says “I am a Hindu”, it means there is equal space for all other religions too. Hinduism never asks people of other religion to convert to itself, for it believes that all religions are one and the same. The core message of Hinduism is that God is one and different people call him with different names. So when I say “I am a Hindu”, I also mean that “You can be a Christian, You can be a Muslim”. Not the same case with other religions like Christianity and Islam which want to convert whole world into their respective religion.

So the core message is that if all religions should continue to exist in the world, then Hinduism should be the most dominant religion on this planet, because it allows every other religion to exist. This universal brotherhood is the reason why I am a Hindu. This is also the reason that why all should fight for the cause of Hinduism to make sure that all other humans can continue to live with their own beliefs and religion, as long as they dont intrude into others. In other words, no missionary or forced conversions should be allowed, nor religious laws should be implemented in public domain like in islamic countries. Keep religion as a private affair. Problems start when we mix politics with it.

Congress Stunts

Congress tried every possible flop method to defeat Modi in this Gujarat elections, and we all know that it utterly failed. Be it wooing BJP rebels, doing Sonia Rahul road shows, false allegations and what not..

One of such funny stunts by Congress was also the advertisements it gave in the local print media about Modi and BJP!

Below are some excerpts

1) In one advertisement it showed a picture of Modi wearing shoes while praying to God!

2) In another advertisement it showed Modi talking to a Muslim!

3) In a third advertisement it showed Advani wearnig a muslim cap!

4) In yet another advertisement it showed the photo of the dreaded terrorist Azhar Masood saying BJP released this terrorist!!

And all this ad propaganda was attempted to show to the Gujaratis that Modi/BJP were not true Hindus!

But the Congress did not realize its mistake when it bought in Sonia and Rahul in the campaign. A common man of Gujarat asked, what is the full name of Sonia and Rahul?

Just an observation

Why do muslims want democracy in all countries where they are in a minroty, ex: India, UK, US, etc where as all the muslim majority countries on this planet are Islamic nations! Democracy when in minority, islamic nation when in majority!

Doesnt it mean that going by this trend, if muslims become a majority on this planet then this will become an islamic earth?

Why in India, a muslim can have upto four wives while people of other religions can have only one? What if I found a new religion which allows 10 wives, which allows taking drugs, etc. Will I be able to practise my religion also?

Government of India gives subsidies to muslims who go to Haj, fine. But on the other hand Hindus who go to Manas Sarovar and Amarnath yatra have to pay taxes? What kind of secularism is this? Even Aurangazeb made non-muslims i.e Hindus pay tax called Jazia tax during the mughal/muslim rule in India. Its the same situation even today, free Haj for muslims, tax for hindus who go to Manas Sarovar!

Muslims have been given minority status in all the Indian states where their percentage are less. Why havent Hindus been given minority status in those Indian states where they are in a minority like in Kashmir, Mizoram etc? What kind of f***** secularism is this?

Can any of my secular friends show the guts to answer my questions?

Why not Past Godhra?

Every body cries only about Post Godhra riots that took place in 2002 Gujarat. But no body even talks about the root cause which was the burning of Sabarmati express train in Godhra burning alive 59 innocent humans just because they were hindus.

How post-Godhra riots would have happened, if there was no Godhra in the first place? Why nobody is trying to address this issue of Godhra?

Great secular stalwarts like Teesta Setalvad who says that she fights for a human cause, talks only about Post Godhra, why not about Past Godhra, i.e before Post Godhra? Werent they humans, those 59 innocent karsevaks who were returning from Ayodhya who were burnt alive in the train by muslims fundamentalists?

The same Teesta Setalvad who talks about the 5000 odd muslims who have been refugees since 2002 in Gujarat’s camps. Why doesnt she or anybody else ever utter a word about 4.5 lakh Kashmiri Hindus who have been refugees since 1990 in their own country!

Can Teesta Setalvad explain the difference between refugees of Gujarat and refugees of Kashmir? There has been an ethnic cleansing of Hindus in Kashmir by the islamic terrorists. Why nobody talks about this. Ethnic cleansing of serbs becomes an international issue, but not of Kashmiri Pandits. Why?

The answer has come in the form of the election results in Gujarat. Enough of this pseudo secularsim now.

Terrorism and Gujarat Elections

Congress objected to it when Modi talked about Terrorism and the ineffectiveness of Congress in handling it. It said Modi is dividing Hindus and Muslims by talking about terrorism! Dividing? I fail to understand how talking about terrorism can be the same as dividing hindus and muslims? A terrorist is a terrorist and has no religion. Is Congress sugeesting that Muslims are terrorists? Who is doing communalism by saying this?

Look at some of the facts now.

All over India in the past three and half years under UPA rule there have been about 4000 deaths due to terrorism!

In Gujarat, under Modi in the past 5 years there has been only one death due to terrorism!

Now that speaks for it when Modi dares the terrorists to try their hands in Gujarat. Isnt this an achievement?

Why was the Congress so opposed to Modi talking about terrorism in the election campaigns? Dont they have the basic common sense that law and order is a state subject in India?

Congress led UPA government has not yet implemented the Supreme Court of India order to give death penalty to the dreaded terrrorist Afzal Guru who masterminded the parliament attacks, even after a year after the order was given by the court!

Isnt this a failure of the Congress?

Congress repealed POTA the act which was brought by the earlier BJP led NDA government to control terrorism. Now none of the people who had carried out terror attacks ever since UPA came to power have been caught or punished. On the other hand in Gujarat, those terrorists who had attacked Akshardham had been gunned down, and the masterminds behind it arrested and convicted under POTA and even punished.

Now tell me, who has won the battle of terrorism? Congress in center or BJP in Gujarat?