Secularism in India Exposed!

Terrorism and Gujarat Elections

Congress objected to it when Modi talked about Terrorism and the ineffectiveness of Congress in handling it. It said Modi is dividing Hindus and Muslims by talking about terrorism! Dividing? I fail to understand how talking about terrorism can be the same as dividing hindus and muslims? A terrorist is a terrorist and has no religion. Is Congress sugeesting that Muslims are terrorists? Who is doing communalism by saying this?

Look at some of the facts now.

All over India in the past three and half years under UPA rule there have been about 4000 deaths due to terrorism!

In Gujarat, under Modi in the past 5 years there has been only one death due to terrorism!

Now that speaks for it when Modi dares the terrorists to try their hands in Gujarat. Isnt this an achievement?

Why was the Congress so opposed to Modi talking about terrorism in the election campaigns? Dont they have the basic common sense that law and order is a state subject in India?

Congress led UPA government has not yet implemented the Supreme Court of India order to give death penalty to the dreaded terrrorist Afzal Guru who masterminded the parliament attacks, even after a year after the order was given by the court!

Isnt this a failure of the Congress?

Congress repealed POTA the act which was brought by the earlier BJP led NDA government to control terrorism. Now none of the people who had carried out terror attacks ever since UPA came to power have been caught or punished. On the other hand in Gujarat, those terrorists who had attacked Akshardham had been gunned down, and the masterminds behind it arrested and convicted under POTA and even punished.

Now tell me, who has won the battle of terrorism? Congress in center or BJP in Gujarat?

Who is an Indian?

Indian is any citizen of India who considers the prosperity and well being of the entire nation of India (which includes its people, flora, fauna, nature, geography, natural resources, culture, heritage everything included) to be above all his personal faiths, ambitions, ideologies and obsessions.

A person who is corrupt cannot be an Indian for corruption is anti-people and anti-society.

A person who keeps his religion above the nation cannot be an Indian for he will collude with anti-national elements who are pro his religion.

A person who comes to power by dividing people in the name of caste cannot be an Indian, for his rule also will benefit only a section of the society and also will divide the society.

A person who tries to appease a certain section of the society cannot be an Indian, for he is not interested in the well being of the entire nation.

A person who supports caste/religion based reservations cannot be an Indian, for again he is only interested in a section of the society and not India as a whole.

A person who supports different law for people based on their religion in the country cannot be an Indian for, you cant commit crime in one religion and get away with it in another religion.

A person who refuses to say Vandemataram based on religious grounds cannot be an Indian, for if you cannot salute your nation, why should the nation provide you space within it?

A person who supports any anti-national elements, obviously cant be an Indian and these anti national elements include corrupt people, terrorism supporters, pseudo secularists doing appeasement politics, fundamentalists, etc.

I am an Indian, are you?